REMARKS ON E11 APPROACH

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Remarks on E11 approach

We consider a few topics in E11 approach to superstring/M-theory: even subgroups (Z2 orbifolds) of En, n=11,10,9 and their connection to Kac-Moody algebras; EE11 subgroup of E11 and coincidence of one of its weights with the l1 weight of E11, known to contain brane charges; possible form of supersymmetry relation in E11; decomposition of l1 w.r.t. the SO(10, 10) and its square root at first few...

متن کامل

Remarks on microperiodic multifunctions

It is well known that a microperiodic function mapping a topological group into reals, which is continuous at some point is constant. We introduce the notion of a microperiodic multifunction, defined on a topological group with values in a metric space, and study regularity conditions implying an analogous result. We deal with Vietoris and Hausdorff continuity concepts.Stability of microperiodi...

متن کامل

E11, K11 and EE11

In the study of conjecture on M-theory as a non-linear realization E11/K11 we present arguments for the following: 1)roots of K11 coincide with the roots of Kac-Moody algebra EE11 with Dynkin diagram given in the paper, 2)one of the fundamental weights of EE11 coincides with l1 weight of E11, known to contain 11d supergravity brane charges. The statement 1) is extended on E10 and E9 algebras. E...

متن کامل

Remarks on Distance-Balanced Graphs

Distance-balanced graphs are introduced as graphs in which every edge uv has the following property: the number of vertices closer to u than to v is equal to the number of vertices closer to v than to u. Basic properties of these graphs are obtained. In this paper, we study the conditions under which some graph operations produce a distance-balanced graph.

متن کامل

Some Remarks on Roeper’s Remarks on Chomsky’s ‘Remarks’

In his 1970 paper ‘Remarks on nominalization’, Noam Chomsky provided several arguments for the lexicalist hypothesis, namely the idea that nouns like refusal, rejection, growth, and so on are nouns throughout the entire syntactic derivation. Tom Roeper’s paper ‘Chomsky’s Remarks and the transformationalist hypothesis’ challenges the lexicalist hypothesis, arguing that such nouns are syntactical...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Modern Physics Letters A

سال: 2006

ISSN: 0217-7323,1793-6632

DOI: 10.1142/s0217732306019645